|
|
|
|
|
Archive
- February, 2011
- January, 2011
- December, 2010
- November, 2010
- October, 2010
- September, 2010
- August, 2010
- July, 2010
- June, 2010
- May, 2010
- April, 2010
- March, 2010
- February, 2010
- January, 2010
- December, 2009
- November, 2009
- October, 2009
- September, 2009
- August, 2009
- July, 2009
- June, 2009
- May, 2009
- April, 2009
- March, 2009
- February, 2009
- January, 2009
- December, 2008
- November, 2008
- October, 2008
- September, 2008
- August, 2008
- July, 2008
- June, 2008
- May, 2008
- April, 2008
- March, 2008
- February, 2008
- January, 2008
- December, 2007
- November, 2007
- October, 2007
- September, 2007
- August, 2007
- July, 2007
- June, 2007
- May, 2007
- April, 2007
- March, 2007
- February, 2007
- January, 2007
- December, 2006
- November, 2006
- October, 2006
- September, 2006
- August, 2006
- July, 2006
- June, 2006
advertisement
Most read articles
advertisement
Latest comments
FeedReader favorites
| 0208 FG: The effect of cutting height on yield and quality of alfalfa |
|
|
|
| Archives - Past Articles | |||
| Wednesday, 09 April 2008 08:44 | |||
|
The increased use of disc mowers, which are much less susceptible to damaged knives than sicklebar mowers, has resulted in many farmers mowing alfalfa fields considerably closer to the soil surface, less than 3 inches of stubble height. Decreasing the amount of stubble left in the field will increase yields. Canadian research reported that cutting five different varieties of alfalfa at 2-inch versus 4-inch increased yield in the first cutting by 588 tons per acre and by 172 tons per acre in the second cutting. Research done in Wisconsin also reported that for each cutting of alfalfa the forage yield increased as cutting height was reduced. However, since the increased yield is due to the harvest of more stem material and not more leaf material, forage quality may decrease. The Canadian research reported a decrease in percent protein as cutting height decreased. The Wisconsin researchers concluded that for each 1-inch reduction in cutting height, forage quality decreased an average of 4 units of relative feed value (RFV). Finally, some forage labs are reporting unusually high ash levels, possibly due to soil contamination from mechanical harvesting, are of concern. Objectives Materials and methods Hand harvest (Prior to field harvest) Two inches of stems were removed, weighed, dried and ground for analysis from harvested material. Remainder of harvested plants was weighed, dried and ground for analysis and this material was used to estimate 4-inch cutting height yield and forage quality. The 2-inch cutting height data was determined by mathematically calculating the yield and forage quality from the weighted average of 2-inch stems removed from the plants and the remainder of the plants for alfalfa and grass species. Alfalfa and grass species harvested were sent to a commercial lab for wet chemistry analysis for determination of NDF, ADF, lignin and ash. Chemical and digestibility parameters of alfalfa and grass species were reported individually and as a combined value representative of field composition determined by calculating the weighted average of the alfalfa and grass. Mower harvest Conclusions References omitted but are available upon request at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it '; document.write( '' ); document.write( addy_text91430 ); document.write( '<\/a>' ); //--> This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it —Excerpts from The William H. Miner Agricultural Research Institute E.D. Thomas, C.S. Ballard, K.W. Cotanch, H.M. Wolford and S.A. Flis. See more articles like this at www.progressiveforage.com
|
0 Comments
Add Comment
advertisement


















Re: purebred guernseys
Posted on Saturday, 08 June 2013 by Ron.Hello! Brooke I am an old retired beef cattle rancher living in...
Re: Les Hansen on crossbreeding: Video footage from 2013 World Ag Expo
Posted on Thursday, 30 May 2013 by Howard Whitmore.Les, Excellant data and explanation. It was the toughest decision I...
Re: HERd management: Tackling the tough questions
Posted on Tuesday, 28 May 2013 by Alison T.I appreciate this sane and thoughtful information. I've got a...